The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mumford, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mumford, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, J
The Veterinary Record, Vol 114, Issue 15, 375-381
Copyright © 1984 by British Veterinary Association


Papers & Articles

Trials of an inactivated equid herpesvirus 1 vaccine: challenge with a subtype 2 virus

JA Mumford and J Bates

Serological responses following two and three doses of an inactivated equid herpesvirus 1 ( EHV -1) vaccine containing a subtype 1 strain were examined in yearling ponies. Complement fixing antibody responses were significantly higher against the subtype 1 vaccine strain than against a subtype 2 virus. Complement fixing antibody responses declined rapidly after the second dose of vaccine and had returned to almost pre-vaccination levels eight weeks after the second dose of vaccine. Complement fixing antibody titres to the heterologous subtype 2 strain increased after each successive dose of vaccine. The neutralising antibody responses following vaccination were weak although less strain specific than the complement fixing antibody responses. When challenged with a subtype 2 strain, 15 ponies which had received three doses of vaccine, two, eight and 12 weeks previously resisted challenge infection. However, 11 out of 15 ponies which had received two doses of vaccine eight and 12 weeks previously were susceptible to infection. While two doses of vaccine did not reduce duration of virus excretion or febrile responses in ponies challenged eight weeks after the second dose, the amount of virus excreted was significantly reduced.





HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1984 British Veterinary Association