The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shoo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shoo, M.
The Veterinary Record, Vol 124, Issue 6, 141-144
Copyright © 1989 by British Veterinary Association


Papers & Articles

Experimental bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis: a review

MK Shoo

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow Veterinary School.

Whenever a 'new' disease is discovered and the putative agent responsible is isolated, it has been customary to attempt to reproduce the disease in similar animals under controlled experimental conditions. If an identical syndrome is produced, then the agent is considered to be responsible for producing the field disease. As early as 1892, Nocard did just that in relation to bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis (shipping/transit fever). His work however, appears to have escaped the attention of many subsequent workers. In the 1930s many workers attempted to reproduce the disease with crude preparations obtained from either sick or dead animals, but most of them failed. After 1950 several agents (bovine herpes virus 1 [BHV1], parainfluenza-3 virus [PI3] and mycoplasmas) were isolated from cases of shipping fever in North America. These, together with physical stress, were thought to be involved in the aetiology and pathogenesis of the disease, with pasteurellae playing the role of secondary invader. Many experimenters then used multiple agents in different combinations, but their degree of success in reproducing the disease was variable. Greater success was achieved when P haemolytica A1 was given to calves four days after exposure to BHV1. This success, although only moderate, reinforced the concept of the secondary role of pasteurellae. After 1977 however, it became increasingly clear that P haemolytica A1 was capable of causing the disease as a primary pathogen, provided that two conditions were fulfilled. First, the calves had to be susceptible, that is, non-immune, and secondly, P haemolytica A1 in the logarithmic growth phase had to be administered to the trachea or lungs in numbers greater than 5 x 10(9) colony forming units.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. Girard, P. Cléroux, P. Tremblay, S. Dea, and Y. St-Pierre
Increased proteolytic activity and matrix metalloprotease expression in lungs during infection by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2001; 82(6): 1253 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
S. K. Highlander, N. D. Fedorova, D. M. Dusek, R. Panciera, L. E. Alvarez, and C. Rinehart
Inactivation of Pasteurella (Mannheimia) haemolytica Leukotoxin Causes Partial Attenuation of Virulence in a Calf Challenge Model
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2000; 68(7): 3916 - 3922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1989 British Veterinary Association