The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, B.
Right arrow Articles by Raptopoulos, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, B.
Right arrow Articles by Raptopoulos, D
The Veterinary Record, Vol 126, Issue 25, 617-620
Copyright © 1990 by British Veterinary Association


Papers & Articles

Induction of anaesthesia in dogs and cats with propofol

BM Weaver and D Raptopoulos

Wellcome Comparative Anaesthetic Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Surgery, University of Bristol, Langford.

Propofol was used to induce anaesthesia in 89 dogs and 13 cats of either sex, various breeds and of widely different ages and weights; they varied considerably in physical condition and were anaesthetised for a variety of investigations and surgical procedures. They were premedicated with acepromazine, papaveretum, diazepam, pethidine, atropine and scopolamine in different combinations. After induction with propofol, anaesthesia was maintained with halothane, isoflurane, methoxyflurane and enflurane and, or, nitrous oxide. The mean (+/- sd) induction doses of propofol in unpremedicated and premedicated animals were 5.2 +/- 2.3 mg/kg and 3.6 +/- 1.4 mg/kg respectively for dogs, and 5.0 +/- 2.8 mg/kg and 5.3 +/- 4.3 mg/kg for cats. There were no differences between the sexes. Premedication did not affect recovery times. The incidence of side effects was very low. One dog showed evidence of pain when propofol was injected. No incompatibility was observed between propofol and the premedicants and other anaesthetic agents used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
C. Braun, E. H. Hofmeister, A. A. Lockwood, and S. L. Parfitt
Effects of Diazepam or Lidocaine Premedication on Propofol Induction and Cardiovascular Parameters in Dogs
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 43(1): 8 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. E. Morey, J. H. Modell, D. Shekhawat, D. O. Shah, B. Klatt, G. P. Thomas, F. A. Kero, M. M. Booth, and D. M. Dennis
Anesthetic Properties of a Propofol Microemulsion in Dogs
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 882 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1990 British Veterinary Association