The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poutrel, B
Right arrow Articles by Ducelliez, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poutrel, B
Right arrow Articles by Ducelliez, M
The Veterinary Record, Vol 126, Issue 26, 638-640
Copyright © 1990 by British Veterinary Association


Papers & Articles

Efficacy of a germicidal post milking barrier-type teat dip in preventing intramammary infections

B Poutrel, F Serieys, and M Ducelliez

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station de Pathologie de la Reproduction, Nouzilly, France.

Five commercial dairy herds with 269 lactating cows participated for 12 months in a field trial to determine the effectiveness of a barrier teat dip containing chlorous acid/chlorine dioxide germicide. The right quarters of the cows in two herds and the left quarters of the cows in three herds were dipped in the experimental teat dip after the removal of the milking machine. The other quarters were dipped in a conventional 0.5 per cent iodophor product. Compared with this control product, teat dipping with the experimental dip reduced the number of new intramammary infections by 18.8 per cent, infections with major pathogens by 13.6 per cent, infections with minor pathogens by 16.8 per cent and clinical mastitis by 33.3 per cent. Statistical analysis indicated a trend towards decreased intramammary infections with coliforms and coagulase-negative staphylococci when the experimental teat dip was used. It was concluded that under the conditions of this investigation it was effective in preventing new infections due to both contagious and some environmental pathogens. However, the data suggested that it could adversely affect the condition of the skin of the teat when it was used after incorrect preparation of the udder.





HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1990 British Veterinary Association