The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cattell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dobson, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cattell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dobson, H
The Veterinary Record, Vol 127, Issue 16, 395-399
Copyright © 1990 by British Veterinary Association


Papers & Articles

A survey of caesarean operations on cattle in general veterinary practice

JH Cattell and H Dobson

Arun Veterinary Group, Pulborough, West Sussex.

The animal most frequently requiring operation for dystocia in this survey of 133 cases was the Friesian/Holstein heifer. In 38 per cent of cases the reason for surgery was an oversized calf and in 84 per cent the operation was performed on the farm of origin. The majority of the dams were operated on while standing, using a left flank incision, and under paravertebral or field infiltration with local anaesthetic solution. Exteriorisation of the uterus did not appear to be essential except when the calf was dead. Ninety-five per cent of the calves alive in utero and 91 per cent of the dams survived, although 30 per cent of the dams suffered ill-health afterwards. In nine cases neither dam nor calf survived. The fertility indices of those which were rebred were not markedly affected, but milk production was reduced by an estimated 12 per cent of the potential yield.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
B. J. McGuirk, R. Forsyth, and H. Dobson
Economic cost of difficult calvings in the United Kingdom dairy herd
Vet Rec., November 17, 2007; 161(20): 685 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1990 British Veterinary Association