The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruys, E
Right arrow Articles by Bolscher, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gruys, E
Right arrow Articles by Bolscher, J.
The Veterinary Record, Vol 133, Issue 16, 385-388
Copyright © 1993 by British Veterinary Association


Papers & Articles

Biocompatibility of glass-encapsulated electronic chips (transponders) used for the identification of pigs

E Gruys, JM Schakenraad, LK Kruit, and JM Bolscher

Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

The biocompatibility of electronic transponders encapsulated in two different types of glass was studied after they had been implanted subcutaneously into pigs for the purpose of identification. Rods of white crystal glass or green iron-containing glass were screened for superficial impurities by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray analysis, revealing a few crystalline and plaque impurities which were similar for both types of glass, and no differences in elemental composition. In vitro cytotoxicity tests using cell cultures of human dermal fibroblasts and haemolysis and clot formation tests in human blood after contact with the rods, showed that both types of glass were biocompatible. When implanted subcutaneously at the base of the ears of pigs for from three to 150 days, both types of transponder appeared to induce a similar connective tissue capsule, on average less than 0.2 mm in thickness, surrounding the rods. A classic foreign body reaction did not occur. It is concluded that the fibrous capsules were due to scar tissue formed around the glass rods as a result of the tissue being damaged when they were implanted. There were no significant differences between the reactions to the two types of glass. The subcutaneous implantation of glass-encapsulated transponders appears to be a good method for identifying pigs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
M. Linder, S. Huther, and M. Reinacher
In vivo reactions in mice and in vitro reactions in feline cells to implantable microchip transponders with different surface materials
Vet Rec., July 11, 2009; 165(2): 45 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1993 British Veterinary Association