The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, I. G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dick, I. G. C.

The Veterinary Record, Vol 138, Issue 4, 79-81
Copyright © 1996 by British Veterinary Association

Evaluation of flea control programmes for cats using fenthion and lufenuron

M. A. Fisher BVetMed, CBiol, MIBiol, MRCVS1, D. E. Jacobs BVMS, PhD, FRVCS, FRCPath1, M. J. Hutchinson BSc. HND1, and I. G. C. Dick BVSc, MRCVS2

1 Department of Pathology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Veterinary College (University of London), North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA
2 Bayer Animal Health, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AH

Four groups of six cats were kept in carpeted pens similarly infected with Ctenocephalides felis. One group was left untreated, but the other groups were treated every 28th day with either an insecticide (fenthion at 30 mg); or an inhibitor of insect development (lufenuron at 133 or 266 mg) or with both. A sudden upsurge in the numbers of fleas occurred on the control cats after 50 days. At this time, the three control strategies had reduced the counts by 91·3, 72·5 and 98·6 per cent, respectively. Thereafter, welfare considerations demanded the limitation of the flea burden on the control cats, but conditions were shown to be favourable for flea development throughout the study. The mean numbers of fleas on the treated groups after six months were 1·2, 11·0 and 0·4, respectively. After this, in addition to the fleas acquired in the pen, the cats were each infected weekly with five fleas to mimic roaming animals introducing extraneous fleas into the home. This produced no obvious effect on the counts and the mean values three months later were 0·5, 11·0 and 0·2, respectively. None of the strategies eradicated the flea population but they all reduced the numbers considerably and worked equally well whether or not small numbers of new fleas were introduced into the system. Significantly lower flea counts were maintained in the early and later stages of the study by the strategies including the insecticide.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1996 British Veterinary Association