The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Schaik, G.
Right arrow Articles by Benedictus, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Schaik, G.
Right arrow Articles by Benedictus, G.

The Veterinary Record, Vol 139, Issue 25, 624-627
Copyright © 1996 by British Veterinary Association

Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against paratuberculosis in dairy cattle

G. van Schaik MSc Agric1, A. A. Dijkhuizen MSc Agric, PhD1, R. B. M. Huirne MSc Agric, PhD1, C. H. J. Kalis DVM2, and G. Benedictus DVM, PhD2

1 Department of Farm Management, Wageningen Agricultural University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 Animal Health Service North-Netherlands, PO Box 361, 9200 AJ Drachten, The Netherlands

Paratuberculosis is an infectious and incurable disease which causes considerable economic losses in dairy cattle, due mainly to premature disposal and losses of milk production. In 1984 the Animal Health Service North-Netherlands started a vaccination trial in which young calves were vaccinated once, to test whether vaccination reduced the production losses and whether the overall costs of vaccination were outweighed by the benefits. Vaccination against paratuberculosis reduced the number of clinically infected animals by almost 90 per cent. It also reduced the numbers of subclinically infected animals and animals with a positive histological and/or bacteriological test result. Although vaccination did not prevent losses in milk production, it reduced the infection pressure and the clinical signs of the disease. Partial budgeting showed that vaccination against paratuberculosis was highly profitable. The costs of vaccination were us$15 per cow and the benefits (total returns minus costs) were us$142 per cow.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J. F. Huntley, J. R. Stabel, M. L. Paustian, T. A. Reinhardt, and J. P. Bannantine
Expression Library Immunization Confers Protection against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Infection
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2005; 73(10): 6877 - 6884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
N. B. Harris and R. G. Barletta
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Veterinary Medicine
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2001; 14(3): 489 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 1996 British Veterinary Association