The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoinville, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by McLean, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoinville, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by McLean, A. R.

The Veterinary Record, Vol 146, Issue 16, 455-461
Copyright © 2000 by British Veterinary Association

Descriptive epidemiology of scrapie in Great Britain: results of a postal survey

L. J. Hoinville BVSc, BSc, MSc, PhD, MRCVS1, A. Hoek BVSc, MSc, MRCVS1, M. B. Gravenor PhD2, and A. R. McLean PhD2

1 Epidemiology Department, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB
2 Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury RG20 7NN

In 1998, a questionnaire was sent to 11,554 British sheep farmers to determine how many believed that scrapie cases had occurred in their flock; 61·4 per cent of them responded anonymously. The results indicated that 14·9 per cent of farmers with more than 30 breeding ewes thought that they had ever experienced scrapie in their flock and 2·7 per cent thought that they had had cases in the past 12 months. A comparison of these results with the number of farmers reporting suspect scrapie cases to MAFF, in accordance with the statutory requirement, suggests that only 13 per cent of farmers who suspect that they may have cases of scrapie are currently reporting them. Scrapie occurred in all regions of the country but there was an apparent regional variation. Larger farms and those with purebred sheep appeared to be at greater risk of having cases. Other differences between affected and unaffected farms included lambing practices and sheep purchasing policy. On the majority of farms the first case occurred in a purchased animal. The survey also revealed a need for the provision of further information about scrapie to farmers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
C. Lewis
Reporting of clinical scrapie in the UK
Vet Rec., September 23, 2006; 159(13): 428 - 428.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
C A Donnelly, N M Ferguson, A C Ghani, and R M Anderson
Extending backcalculation to analyse BSE data
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 2003; 12(3): 177 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
N. Hunter
Scrapie and experimental BSE in sheep
Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2003; 66(1): 171 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2000 British Veterinary Association