The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weeks, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Warriss, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weeks, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Warriss, P. D.

The Veterinary Record, Vol 150, Issue 24, 743-748
Copyright © 2002 by British Veterinary Association

Influence of the design of facilities at auction markets and animal handling procedures on bruising in cattle

C. A. Weeks BSc, PhD1, P. W. McNally MSc1, and P. D. Warriss BSc, PhD, MIBiol, FIFST1

1 Division of Food Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU

The movements of cattle at 12 livestock auction markets were observed to determine the possible causes of trauma leading to carcase bruising. Design faults included right-angled bends in races, dead ends, flooring with insufficient slope or grip, and steps. Sliding gates were often misused for goading cattle. Projecting fittings and square-edged corners were potentially injurious; conversely, rounded posts and curved races assisted the flow of cattle with minimal impacts. At all the markets, some cattle were hit directly and poked with wooden sticks, and the variations in their use could partially explain the differences between the markets in the prevalence of carcase bruising. Most harder hits were directed at less valuable parts of the body, such as the spine, hips and shoulders, and a survey of bruising at the abattoir showed that these were the areas with most bruising. In this survey of 48,926 carcases, the overall level of commercially significant bruising of 4·1 per cent was lower than the 6·5 per cent found in a previous survey. Carcases of cattle from markets had a greater incidence and severity of bruising (P<0·001) than those arriving directly from farms or dealers. Carcase bruising in young bulls was less (P<0·001) than in heifers and steers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Rushen and A. M. de Passille
Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion.
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 2965 - 2972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2002 British Veterinary Association