The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pagazaurtundua, A.
Right arrow Articles by Warriss, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pagazaurtundua, A.
Right arrow Articles by Warriss, P. D.
The Veterinary Record 158:679-682 (2006)
© 2006 British Veterinary Association


Papers and Articles

Measurements of footpad dermatitis in broiler chickens at processing plants

A. Pagazaurtundua, MSc, MRCVS1 and P. D. Warriss, BSc, PhD, CBiol, MIBiol, FIFST1

1 School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU

A four-point photographic scale was developed to score the severity of lesions of footpad dermatitis (FPD) in broiler chickens. There was a linear relationship between the square root of the relative area of the lesions and their scores, and good agreement between different assessors using the scale. The scale was used to assess samples of 100 birds from each of 190 flocks slaughtered at two UK processing plants in 2002 and 2003; 12 of the flocks (6·3 per cent) had no lesions, but the others had lesions of different prevalences and severity. The maximum proportion of affected birds in a flock was 92 per cent. In the 178 affected flocks, 84·0 per cent of the birds had no lesions and 16·0 per cent had some evidence of FPD. The overall unweighted prevalence of birds with FPD in all 190 flocks sampled was 18·1 per cent; 10·2 per cent had only small lesions, on average equivalent in area to 2·1 per cent of the total area of the foot, 6·2 per cent had lesions on average equivalent to 6·6 per cent of the area of the foot, and 1·7 per cent had lesions on average equivalent to 21·5 per cent of the area of the foot. There were differences between the two plants in the overall prevalence and severity of FPD, but this may have been due to the fact that the plants were sampled at different times of the year.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2006 British Veterinary Association