The Veterinary Record Link to Vetlife website
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arkell, M.
Right arrow Articles by May, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arkell, M.
Right arrow Articles by May, S. A.
The Veterinary Record 159:346-348 (2006)
© 2006 British Veterinary Association


Papers and Articles

Evidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameness in horses

M. Arkell, BVetMed, MRCVS1, R. M. Archer, BVSc, DipACVS, MRCVS1, F. J. Guitian, DVM, PhD1 and S. A. May, MA, VetMB, PhD, DVR, DEO, DipECVS, FRCVS1

1 Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA

Eighteen observers were influenced to different extents in the grades of lameness they allocated to eight horses by whether they knew that a nerve block had been administered; on a scale from 0 to 10 the mean difference in grade allocated once the observer knew a horse had been nerve-blocked was increased by 0·4. The consistency of the assessments made by the individual observers was good, with a an average of 0·6 of a grade difference when grading the same horse on two occasions. The agreement between the assessments of four orthopaedic experts was reasonable (±1 grade), but significantly poorer for four non-experts and 10 final year veterinary students.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2006 British Veterinary Association