The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannion, C.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannion, C.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, J.
The Veterinary Record 161:371-375 (2007)
© 2007 British Veterinary Association


Papers and Articles

Efficacy of cleaning and disinfection on pig farms in Ireland

C. Mannion, MVB1, F. C. Leonard, MVB, PhD, MRCVS1, P. B. Lynch, MAgSc, MS, PhD2 and J. Egan, MVB, MVM, PhD, FRCVS3

1 School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
2 Pig Production Department, Moorepark Research Centre, Teagasc, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
3 Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Backweston, Celbridge, Ireland

Little is known about the effectiveness of the cleaning and disinfection methods used on commercial pig farms either in Ireland or worldwide. A National Salmonella Control Programme was implemented in Ireland in August 2002 to monitor and control the infection of pigs with Salmonella species. Commercial pig herds must be categorised according to their Salmonella status as either category 1, 2 or 3, having a serological prevalence of infection with Salmonella serotypes up to 10 per cent, between 10 and 50 per cent or more than 50 per cent, respectively. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of washing and disinfecting finisher units on category 1 and category 3 farms in reducing or eliminating the levels of contamination. Counts of Enterobacteriaceae were used as indicators of the contamination of the environment with enteric bacteria, which could include Salmonella species. Samples were taken from the pen floors, feeders and drinkers of seven category 1 and seven category 3 farms, and Enterobacteriaceae and salmonellae were enumerated in each sample. The results suggested that intensive cleaning and disinfection was effective at reducing levels of Enterobacteriaceae on the pen floors of both categories, but that residual contamination remained on the surfaces of the feeders and drinkers on all the farms, particularly on the category 3 farms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
P. M. Dorr, D. A. Tadesse, B. M. Zewde, P. Fry, S. Thakur, and W. A. Gebreyes
Longitudinal Study of Salmonella Dispersion and the Role of Environmental Contamination in Commercial Swine Production Systems
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2009; 75(6): 1478 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2007 British Veterinary Association