The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coello, M. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buncic, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coello, M. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buncic, S.
The Veterinary Record 161:719-722 (2007)
© 2007 British Veterinary Association


Papers and Articles

Microbiological differences between cull cattle slaughtered at an abattoir and cull cattle slaughtered on farms

M. J. Sarnago Coello, CertVPH(FH), MRCVS1, A. Small, BVM&S, DipECVPH, DVPH(MH), CertVPH(MH), PhD, MRCVS1 and S. Buncic, DVM, PhD1

1 Division of Farm Animal Science, School of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU

Correspondence: Correspondence to Dr Small whose present address is Food Science Australia, PO Box 3312, Tingalpa DC, Queensland 4173, Australia

Tissue samples from 27 casualty adult dairy cattle slaughtered on farms and 32 'normal' cull dairy cattle were analysed microbiologically for total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter species. Overall the counts of Enterobacteriaceae and TVC were higher in the animals slaughtered on farms, particularly in the spleen. One 'normal' animal yielded E coli O157, and one yielded Campylobacter jejuni, and eight of the cattle slaughtered on farms yielded C jejuni and five yielded S enterica.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
J. K. Aldiss
On-farm emergency slaughter
Vet Rec., December 15, 2007; 161(24): 825 - 825.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2007 British Veterinary Association