The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murrell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hellebrekers, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murrell, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hellebrekers, L. J.
The Veterinary Record 162:403-408 (2008)
© 2008 British Veterinary Association


Papers and Articles

Application of a modified form of the Glasgow pain scale in a veterinary teaching centre in the Netherlands

J. C. Murrell, BVSc, PhD, DipECVA, MRCVS1, E. P. Psatha, DVM, MSc1, E. M. Scott, BSc, PhD2, J. Reid, BVMS, PhD, DVA, DipECVA, MRCVS3 and L. J. Hellebrekers, DVM, PhD, DipECVA1

1 Division of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, University of Utrecht, PO Box 80154, 3508 TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
3 Institute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH

The Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale was developed to measure acute pain in dogs in a hospital setting. In this investigation a modified version of the scale was applied in a centre with a different surgical case load and analgesic protocols, and where English is not the first language, to test its validity in a different clinical environment. The modified scale was used to score pain in 60 dogs during the 24 hours after surgery. Their levels of sedation and a clinical impression of their pain were scored at the same time. Three questions were considered; first, how the modified pain score was related to the pain assessed subjectively, secondly, how it related to variables such as the surgical procedure and the dog's health and thirdly, how it changed over time. The mean modified pain scores for the dogs rated subjectively as having no, mild, moderate or severe pain were significantly different, indicating that the modified scale distinguished between pain of different severities. The changes in the dogs' scores also followed the expected changes in their level of pain with time, providing empirical evidence that the scale measures pain.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2008 British Veterinary Association