The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Bækbo, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Angen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Bækbo, P.
The Veterinary Record 163:445-447 (2008)
© 2008 British Veterinary Association


Papers and Articles

Effect of tulathromycin on the carrier status of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 in the tonsils of pigs

Ø. Angen, DVM, PhD1, M. Andreasen, DVM, PhD2, E. O. Nielsen, DVM, PhD3, A. Stockmarr, MSc, PhD1 and P. Bækbo, DVM, PhD3

1 National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, DK-1790 Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Orion Pharma Animal Health, Møllevej 9A, DK-2990 Nivå, Denmark
3 Danish Pig Production, Danish Meat Association, Vinkelvej 11, DK-8620 Kjellerup, Denmark

The effect of a single or double dose of tulathromycin was evaluated in pigs carrying Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 in their tonsils. Twenty-nine pigs from a reinfected specific pathogen-free-herd were selected from animals testing positive in an A pleuropneumoniae serotype 2-specific PCR test on tonsil scrapings and they were divided into three groups. The pigs in group 1 were treated subcutaneously with 2·5 mg/kg tulathromycin on day 0, the pigs in group 2 were treated with 2·5 mg/kg tulathromycin on days 0 and 4, and the pigs in group 3 were left untreated as controls. The pigs were tested by PCR on tonsil scrapings on days 0, 4, 11 and 33, and on day 33 all the animals were euthanased. There were no significant differences between the numbers of PCR-positive animals in the three groups on any of the sampling dates.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2008 British Veterinary Association