The Veterinary Record
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Blunden, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Blunden, A. S.
The Veterinary Record 165:281-288 (2009)
© 2009 British Veterinary Association


Papers

Comparison of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance images of cadaver limbs of horses

R. C. Murray, MA, VetMB, MS, DipECVS, DipACVS, PhD, MRCVS1, T. S. Mair, BVSc, PhD, DipECEIM, EIM, DESTS, MRCVS2, C. E. Sherlock, BVetMed, MRCVS2 and A. S. Blunden, BVetMed, PhD, MRCPath, MRCVS1

1 Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket CB8 7UU
2 Bell Equine Veterinary Clinic, Mereworth, Maidstone, Kent ME18 5GS

Correspondence: Correspondence to Dr Mair, e-mail: tim.mair{at}btinternet.com

Eleven limbs taken postmortem from 10 lame horses were examined by MRI in a low-field 0·27T system designed for standing horses and a high-field 1·5T system used to examine anaesthetised horses. Nine limbs were examined in the foot/pastern region and two in the fetlock region, and the results were compared with gross pathological examinations and histological examinations of selected tissues. The appearance of normal tissues was similar between the two systems, but the anatomical arrangement of the structures was different due to differences in positioning, and a magic angle artefact was observed at different sites in some imaging sequences. Articular cartilage could be differentiated into two articular surfaces in most joints in the high-field images but could generally be separated only at the joint margins in the low-field images. Abnormalities of tendon, ligament and bone detected by gross examination were detected by both forms of MRI, but some details were clearer on the high-field images. Articular cartilage found to be normal on pathological examination was also classified as normal on MRI, but lesions in articular cartilage detected on pathological examination were identified only by high-field MRI. An abnormality was detected on MRI of all the limbs that had abnormal navicular flexor fibrocartilage on pathological examination.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS JOBS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2009 British Veterinary Association